1Kurbanbekov B., 2Naji Gench, 3Berkimbaev K., 4Ramankulov Sh., 5Kelesbaev K., 6Karimzhanov Ya.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17321962

Google scholar: 

Zenodo community: https://zenodo.org/records/17321962

Nordic_press journal: 


MAQOLANI YUKLAB OLISH

SERTIFIKATNI YUKLAB OLISH


REVIEW: 

The article titled “The Necessity of Establishing a STEM Park: Impact on Students’ Ability to Perform Effectively in a Rapidly Changing Environment” by Kurbanbekov B., Naji Gench, Berkimbaev K., Ramankulov Sh., Kelesbaev K., and Karimzhanov Ya. presents a well-structured and scientifically grounded analysis of how STEM-based educational environments contribute to developing students’ emotional intelligence, adaptability, and other essential 21st-century competencies.

The relevance of the research is exceptionally high. In an era marked by rapid technological advancement and constant social change, the demand for adaptive, emotionally intelligent, and innovation-driven individuals has become central to education systems worldwide. The authors convincingly argue that traditional academic instruction alone is insufficient for preparing students for modern professional and social challenges, and that STEM parks provide a dynamic, technology-driven environment conducive to comprehensive student development.

From a methodological perspective, the study demonstrates a balanced and interdisciplinary approach, combining theoretical analysis, project-based and experimental methods, observation, expert assessment, and visualization. Such a methodological combination ensures the credibility and validity of the findings, as it allows the authors to assess both cognitive and affective learning outcomes. The inclusion of case-based evidence from projects utilizing Arduino, 3D printing, and robotics adds practical depth and substantiates the article’s claims with tangible examples.

The research findings are articulated clearly and supported by both qualitative and experimental data. The study effectively demonstrates that STEM environments enhance students’ ability to regulate emotions, adapt to novel situations, think critically, and collaborate effectively in teams. Particularly commendable is the discussion of how emotional intelligence and adaptability are fostered not merely through theoretical instruction but through active engagement in project-based and problem-solving tasks. The inclusion of detailed tables and visual models enriches the paper’s analytical rigor and provides concrete evidence of the competencies developed.

A notable strength of the paper lies in its holistic view of education. By emphasizing both cognitive and emotional dimensions of learning, the authors transcend the narrow boundaries of technical training and present STEM education as a human-centered and adaptive pedagogical model. The argument that a STEM park contributes not only to academic success but also to personal and social growth is well justified and aligns with contemporary international research in the field of educational innovation.

At the same time, a few recommendations may further enhance the study’s impact. The authors could expand on how the proposed STEM park model could be integrated into national education systems at different levels (school, college, university), and what policy or infrastructure considerations are necessary for successful implementation. Comparative data from other countries with established STEM ecosystems (e.g., Finland, Singapore, or South Korea) would also strengthen the global applicability of the study’s conclusions.

In its conclusion, the paper provides a convincing synthesis of results and highlights the pedagogical, social, and developmental benefits of STEM-oriented learning. The acknowledgment of governmental support and funding adds transparency and credibility to the research process.

Overall, the article represents a significant contribution to the field of modern pedagogy and educational innovation. It combines theoretical insight, empirical validation, and practical recommendations in a coherent and scientifically rigorous manner. The study can serve as a valuable reference for educators, policymakers, and researchers seeking to integrate STEM-based environments into the education system to cultivate emotionally intelligent, adaptive, and future-ready learners.


Overall Evaluation:

  • Scientific relevance: Excellent

  • Methodological soundness: High

  • Clarity and organization: Excellent

  • Innovative contribution: Strong

  • Recommendation: Highly recommended for publication without major revisions.